A few days ago, Windows defender identified BurstService as a malicious trojan a.zpevdo. But according to virustotal, the virus is not dangerous and only three antiviruses mark it suspicious. Moreover, all these antimalware tools decided that the file is dangerous only because of "behavioral methods". For example, McAfee named the infection Artemis[id]. It means that they don't know exactly what executable file does. It seems to me, that BurstService is safe and only reason of its block is a mistake.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий